METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPARISONS OF UPPER EXTREMITY EMG BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS WITH AND WITHOUT PARAPLEGIA

Authors

Anna C. Severin, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimFollow
Gertjan Ettema, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayFollow
Julia K. Baumgart, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimFollow

Category

Paralympics

Document Type

Paper

Abstract

This study compared normalization methods for surface electromyography (sEMG) for comparing individuals with (Para) and without (AB) paraplegia. Participants (Para, n=7, AB, n=11) performed 4 minutes of arm-cycling at several submaximal intensities, and an incremental maximal test to exhaustion, while sEMG of the right biceps brachii was recorded. This study analyzed sEMG at two intensities: rate of perceived exertion (RPE) 13 and at 60 W, with four methods of normalization: non-normalized, against a maximal voluntary contraction (MVIC), against a rate of perceived exertion (RPE) 9, and against the max test. Using submaximal exercise intensity based on RPE or power output will affect the results when comparing sEMG of Para and AB groups, regardless of which normalization method is used to inspect the data.

Recommended Citation

Severin, Anna C.; Ettema, Gertjan; and Baumgart, Julia K. (2021) "METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPARISONS OF UPPER EXTREMITY EMG BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS WITH AND WITHOUT PARAPLEGIA," ISBS Proceedings Archive: Vol. 39: Iss. 1, Article 85.
Available at: https://commons.nmu.edu/isbs/vol39/iss1/85